Institutional seal European Organisation
for Strategic Policy
EN / عربي Contact
Institutional seal European Organisation
for Strategic Policy
EN / عربي
European Organisation for Strategic Policy

Topic: <span>Economic Policy</span>

Publication

European–Gulf Economic Partnership between Bilateral Agreements and Regional Integration

The recommended approach combines workable bilateral negotiations with Gulf coordination that protects the movement of inputs and suppliers. A trade agreement does not itself create industrial integration. Each project must demonstrate cross-border operability, viability without open-ended guarantees, and benefits for suppliers and skills. Success should be measured by lower implementation costs and durable production, rather than agreement counts or announced investment values.

Open record →
Publication

European–Gulf Defence Industrial Partnership

A European–Gulf partnership can create industrial value beyond equipment purchases through documented demand, financing linked to delivery, defined knowledge rights and end-use controls. The paper favours selective cooperation in industrial services, supplier qualification, training and quality assurance, expanding when viability is demonstrated. European funding has separate conditions; political cooperation does not give Gulf firms automatic eligibility.[5][7] It proposes an initial eighteen-month programme for willing parties after project approval, measuring local capability, supply continuity and industrial returns, with suspension when licences cannot be secured or knowledge transfer fails.

Open record →
Publication

Financing Syria’s Recovery Europe’s Options to Reduce Risk and Support Stability

This paper favours multilateral grants and tightly defined electricity projects as the first stage of European support, followed by partial guarantees only when operating viability, contracting integrity and equitable service access can be demonstrated. Europe’s legal reopening creates room to act; it does not itself resolve weak data, diversion risks or unequal access between communities. Funding should support a functioning network and a verifiable service, while humanitarian assistance continues to follow need. The paper proposes decision gates separating legal clearance, technical readiness and financial expansion, backed by independent oversight, the ability to halt a compromised contract and arrangements to protect essential services. This is an analytical proposal, not a quantified forecast of investment returns or political stability.

Open record →